RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

Oh, and I don't know about you, but when I go to search page, the profile at the top is always pipearl4christ spreadeagled with her vagina hanging out

I've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question.


John aka cobeachbum

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

I know the feeling, lol. Took several times for me to get a pic that would stay.

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

I've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question.John aka cobeachbum

Here's one of pipearl4christ photos that is apparently OK:

https://cdn.truenudists.com/media/a/5/4/a541016ac1c3d8bb0aa7cd2bbc1320ce0525a229.jpg

John aka cobeachbum

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

The difference between a spread eagle male and female photo is this:

A spread eagle female photo is considered 'invitational' whereas a spread eagle male photo is considered to be 'aggressive' and 'forceful'.

Men are considered to be predators and women are not. This may be why male spread eagle photos are not allowed but female photos are.

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

What a stupid sexually biased way to look at things.That's not at you, sunluver, but at the viewpoint itself. Complete hypocrisy, the view point. And women can be aggressive as hell... all these stupid baked in cultural assumptions about gender and sexuality. Drives me nuts sometimes.

We are also forced to be politically correct these days and it has come to the point where white males are advertised to be the scum of society and who are also perceived and stereotyped by the media to be those who always discriminate against other groups and yet are never discriminated against.

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

Further amusing note: click "newest sign up" and hit search --- there are TWENTY PAGES of blank profiles with generic name-generated First/Last names of "woman" profiles. Yep. Twenty pages of it. You see a couple of actual profiles tossed in there, but it's almost exclusively suspicious female profiles just waiting to be used by the pornobots.

As of today, 3 months later the majority of "Newest Signup" profiles are men. Counts up to 398576, which is actually ALL members I think. The worrying thing is that you can delve in by 220 members and you still see a majority of members with no friends, no media and normally no more profile than age and gender who have signed up in the last few hours or days.

I think the least that should happen is that the profile should be filled out to say 50% before these members even appear in any lists, and more before they can solicit or accept friends. Although it is understandable that people dip a toe in the water and look around before they venture further, there needs to be some way to limit the fake and sexually oriented members. TrueNudists should not be a site where people advertise prostitution, swap pictures, list nothing in their profile other than a link to a sex oriented website.

Why is it some people have no profile and 100s of friends? What human is interested in such a statistic. Are these the pornbots? What use do they serve? Why are they on a True Nudist site? Should this site not cater first for people that are true nudists, rather than voyeurs, exhibitionists, prostitutes, those looking for hookups or bisexual curious engagements?

How many members are certified of the 398,000? The answer 22,896. How many with photos? The answer 20,840. Only 815 have videos, and I have never viewed a single one! How many have been members over 2 years? How many have Forum Posts? Only 815, and the majority, if not all, appear to be certified. Also most of these have been members for at least 2 years, with many over 5 years. Of the hundreds I skimmed past I saw one mini-icon I did not recognise. Found it . Looks like a hogs head or a spy. It was T e a m t r u e 1 [remove spaces] and is an A dmin istrat ors profile. How many men? Answer 338,312, which leaves 60,264 for all other categories. A mere 15%. Of those 28,909 women and 21,983 couples, leaving 9,372 for trans and other. Are these realistic ratios for those who are genuine nudists and go camping, swimming, stay at resorts or belong to social nudist clubs?
Realistically there are probably 25,000 true nudists on this site. The rest are here for looking or hooking!

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

Oh, and I don't know about you, but when I go to search page, the profile at the top is always pipearl4christ spreadeagled with her vagina hanging outI've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question.John aka cobeachbum

I think she is friendly with the owners of this site so she can put any photo up she likes and, if someone complains about her photo that doesn't comply with the rules she knows about and then she blocks them, but in my case I think it was only a comment I made about the type of photos she posts for her to block me.

This post was edited
RE:Discrimination by TrueNudists Admin

oh waa.

This post was edited