Pushing things a bit too far is putting it mildly and being diplomatic but thanks for the support. Booting them off the site is maybe too much, maybe keep them here and educate about boundaries of what 's acceptable and what is good photography. It seems that some of the sensors won't let any genitalia shots that they consider not in context on a personal site but it is up to the moderators of the group to manage the photo's in question. The shots taken from the feet upwards so genitals are a focus but the face is shown, should be removed, unless the focus is not just cock & balls. Those shots of people pretending to be asleep often with the C&B focus, just remove, they are not real and poor photo's anyway.
Good point Alexander about the individual having to determine what is "Artistic". the group description does say that. Maybe we should be asking the photo supplier to explain how their photo is artistic. Hey, I love the human body and seeing it naked but most of the dick pic's sent are poor quality and seem to be saying "hey look at me", well just under 1/2 the world has one so my question is how is yours artistic? Hey, a penis can be presented in a strong way or a powerful way, like a vagina can be in a beautiful way. It's just that most dicks are not show this way and as Raven says, there are plenty of other sites on the web to post or look ate close up's.
Just throwing down the challenge to presenters to show how their photo is artistic, in their own way.
I totally agree, the group is called "Artistic" not Gynaecology in depth,I see this group has all the usual exhibitionists lol, its a shame really, there are other sites for that sort of thing.Personally its not for me, but artistic means something completely different..........Just sayin
Maybe the site should change its name to True Exhibitionists.
I totally agree with you. The nudist say it is not about sex, but they make it sexual. I do not think it appropriate to make comments on people's bodies; i.e. breast, vaginas, & penis' . This shouldn't be a porn site. Thank you for your comment.
I totally agree with you. The nudist say it is not about sex, but they make it sexual. I do not think it appropriate to make comments on people's bodies; i.e. breast, vaginas, & penis' . This shouldn't be a porn site. Thank you for your comment.
I don't agree with you:I do not think it appropriate to make comments on people's bodies; i.e. breast, vaginas, & penis' . This shouldn't be a porn site.
Nudists shouldn't leave it up to porn sites to comment about people's body. Nudists have a different view of breast, vagina and penis. That should be made clear here.
I used to manage a restaurant that every month hosted the works of a different artist on its walls, generally recommended and mounted by one or another local gallery. One such exhibit was of a photographer's work, and one of her photos was, in fact, a dick closeup. It gave me pause when I saw what they were putting up, but it really was nicely done, well lit. sculptural, so I let it stand. For the month it was on display there was no fuss about it. If it had NOT been so well done, I'm sure it would have been found offensive, if I'd let it stay on the wall at all.
When I used to pose for art classes, I got down off the podium at a break one day, and noticed that one of the artists had filled her 18x24 sketch pad with a closeup of my genitalia. You never know. Any part of the body is a fit subject for study.
Agreed, though, that dick-pic selfies are generally not such careful studies.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!