RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

Multiple posts from this pervert over last few days. Both user and posts have been flagged yet admin do nothing.
Yes there is sexual discussion on here which some question it's place on a naturist site, but this is just straightforward illegal and the site admin MUST be able to respond to this type of thing within his, not days.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

Multiple posts from this pervert over last few days. Both user and posts have been flagged yet admin do nothing.Yes there is sexual discussion on here which some question it's place on a naturist site, but this is just straightforward illegal and the site admin MUST be able to respond to this type of thing within his, not days.

We, and every other legitimate couple / person on this site agrees, that Creeps like this poster, should be Removed and Banned from this site, and from all sites like this one.
But...how about taking it one step further, and just remove this entire "Sex" tion, permanently.
From what we have seen, whether it be on this site, or at the various Nude Resorts or at the various Nude Beaches, most of the practising Nudists, are all in their 50s and "UP"!
Like come on?
IF.....at your OLD Age... lol, You have not yet figured out your own Sexual Tastes / or your own Sexual Comfort Levels / and "IF" you are not yet qualified.... to write your own versions of the Kinsey Report, then just may be.... you are better off, just keeping your clothes on, and getting into Stamp collecting or Bird watching.
Its almost as if? This site, actually invites and attracts .... these types of Creeps / Pervs and others just like them, to either Post these Childish discussions, or to join in on them ....and keep them going, in order to get some constant activity going, on this generally Boring site.
Why just Ban this one Creep?
There will be another Jim Short type of Ped / Perv, right around the very next corner, using yet another fictional name and another empty profile.
Our suggestion would be, to just remove this entire Sex tion of this Forum.
Everyone continues to state, that Nudism and Sex, have absolutely nothing to do with one another, so if that is the case......WHY even have this Sex tion included for discussion?
Just Remove it.....and that will be the end, of the Pervs and the Peds and the JO Artists!
May be, carry this one step further, and just BAN anyone and everyone....who does not have a complete and detailed profile.....which would include pictures ( Faces not required, for Privacy reasons ) and being Certified.
We are still not Certified ( and we have been members on this site now, for years ) , as we have never felt the need, and it was never ever a requirement, and still isn't.
We would get Certified.... in a Heart Beat, if it was actually a requirement for being on this site, and it should be.
Certification should come in the form of being Certified by other Certified couples, that you have "actually met", at the various Nude Resorts or at the various Nude Beaches.....as opposed to just being a Closet / Pretend Nudist, that no one can really vouch for.
As of now, anyone can be on this site, without being Certified or vouched for, and that is where the problems and issues like this, arise from.
If it was not for these Creeps and these Pervs and the SEX section , this site would Die a pretty quick Death, just from the Boredom alone.
How about all the REAL Couples and all the REAL Singles, "DARE" or "DEMAND" for the Moderators, to BAN any discussion to do with, or that involves SEX at all......to be Removed...before it ever gets Posted?
Anything to do with Erections, and Penis's / your Son or Daughter / your Pets / LOL......your Washing Machines or Dryers etc.......be BANNED from the Forum.
Pretty Simple FIX!
Will they do it?
NO.....they are wanting the Activity to remain, on their site.
Sex Sells......always has ......always will.
Why do you think, that they only have the Nicer looking Bodies on view, for their Advertising purposes?......and the Younger Hotter Bodies posted on their Opening page?
Do you see them, using any of the pictures, of the Real sites and of the Real Visuals, of the Older "Over Weight" / Fat couples that you will see at all of the Resorts / Beaches?
NO, you don't and will not!
Its all about attracting more and more and more Members.
SEX Sells......and that is why, they will never ever remove the "SEX" SEX tion, on their own Nudist Forum.
Yet......SEX and NUDITY have absolutely Nothing to do, with one another, when it comes to being a Nudist? LOL
How Hypercritical is this site, and its members?
Just BAN the SEX Topic, if that is the case.
Once again, a very simple Fix.










This post was edited
RE: Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

This is the correct answer from an anthropological side of things. Men and women are sexual beings. To deny such is to foolish. But the life style of nudism should be seen as no more sexual than the textile lifestyle. Men and women have are sexual and engage in sexual activity whether clothed or unclothed. Nudism is just more widely related by the textile community as sexual because most people get nude when engaging in the sexual act of intercourse. But again nudist and nudism is not necessarily anymore sexual than textiles are, we are all people.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

Of course, we're all human. To deny sexuality is ... weird.

Sexuality is frowned upon by sects within the nudist/naturist community, but not everyone.

It falls under the "time and place for everything" category.

One example is the World Naked Bike Ride here in Portland. The actual bike ride and gathering before and immediately after was full-on family friendly with no place for sexuality (other than clinical discussions or something). As the afterparty (outside in a out of the way, but public place) wore on, it became less ... eh, "family friendly." It was still a nudist event, still open to everyone, but maybe not the children. But at that hour, why would anyone have children around anyway?

As far as I can tell, sexuality has a place in nudism but it depends on where one is.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

The WNBR isn't a nudist event, and never has been. You, and many others are confusing sexual with sensual. Lack of clothing does not equate to lack of morals.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

Perhaps this statement is useful.
"Nudity is a state of being and Sexuality is an activity."
Original source unknown and I saw it here on TN.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

So bored of this subject,

I go to the beach or spend time with people I do not fancy or find physically attractive, i am naked and so are they is this sexy? - no

I do this with someone I like beyond just normal friendship, we are naked is this sexy? - it can be

Is it because they are naked it becomes sexy? - it might be

Does that mean nudity is sexy? it can be

So naturism is sexy? Naturism equals nudity,

nudity can be sexy (so can being dressed) , just how many ways does this need to be discussed? At the right time with the right person in the right circumstances etc. I am not going to beat myself to death with a long stick just because I find someone sexy in fear of being cast from the naturist membership. What I am going to do is rant at any idiot who feels the need to become a saint and ignore biology just because they have taken their clothes off. Do you find people sexy when you are dressed, or they are clothed? do we need to talk about that, of course not, that is acceptable, what a load of hypocritical crap. People can be sexy clothed, naked, standing on their heads in a pool of mud, or any other activity we can engage in, get a grip people, I don't like wearing clothes i am certainly not going to start wearing a halo.

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

So bored of this subject,

Here, in the US of A, we have an interesting paradox. A dichotomy of sorts between puritanical values and a sex-"obsessed" culture. I think people like Kim Kardashian are a good example, who has managed to build a multi-million dollar empire based on a "leaked" sex tape and consistent exhibitionism. Although she is not a porn star in the strict sense of the term, she had managed to capitalize on our culture's sex-obsession, while at the same time portraying herself as a family-oriented businesswoman. Miley Cyrus used the same formula to boost her popularity and record sales. Only in America.

This dichotomy has led to a sort of tribalism in nudism. You're either part of the group that believes nudity and sexuality are interrelated; or part of the group that believes nudity and sexuality have nothing to do with each other. Even though many of us are somewhere in the middle, any assertion for or against "lumps" us in one category or the other. It's a little like politics: if you believe in helping the poor you're a radical liberal; if you believe in free market you're radical right-winger. The system is rigged in a way that you're almost "forced" to choose one side. And then, of course, you're always going to have conflict between the two "tribes."
(Right now I've got the Frankie goes to Hollywood - Two Tribes song going through my head lol)

I've mentioned my personal experience in several previous posts. I've experienced both ends of the spectrum; sometimes at separate times, sometimes within the same nudist event. Sometimes fleetingly, sometimes in a more pronounced way. I'm not going to judge someone because they got a little drunk at a nudist party and flirted with me a little "provocatively." I know that we are all sexual being and our sexuality can manifest, naturally or even unconsciously, given different circumstances. With or without clothes on.


This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

So bored of this subject,Here, in the US of A, we have an interesting paradox. A dichotomy of sorts between puritanical values and a sex-"obsessed" culture.

Thank you an intelligent open reply from the other side of the Atlantic, this is refreshing as in the threads and main chat room i experience a reluctance to communicate and as you say- a fit in the the box and be seen to be in it or else we disconnect with you pressure, while in private communication even those who make simplified anti statements in public suddenly become very relaxed and open. It is like the UK in the 1950's. I find this is regional and not a nudist specific dichotomy, the US is seen to be progressive and a world leader as it exports a culture yet there is clearly a very defined split in attitudes there. I always relate this to the church influence as it is so often quoted by those who preach - do not talk openly, you are suggesting it is more of a cultural thing. It would be great if people contributed to this thread not with we don't want to talk about this but with- my opinion is this and the reason i have these views is.. culture is such a dark and easily manipulated thing. As an outsider of the US it does come across that the views expressed by many are a collective script almost dictated by social / political sector point of view not a personal based on life experience one.

Great reply thanks, I might no longer be bored now. Anyone else like to comment on culture vs human nature?

This post was edited
RE:Is There a Sexual Side to Nudism?

I feel that there isn't a sexual side to nudism. What the issue comes in is when people sexualize nudity and do the "perverted" twist of nudity. We were born naked it isn't sexual. We shower naked, it isn't sexual, but some how some people automatically equate nudity as sexual.

Naked Colors Podcast

This post was edited
  • [[USERNAME]] sent you a friend request
  • [[USERNAME]] said "[[OTHER]]"
  • [[USERNAME]] accepted your friend request
  • [[USERNAME]] commented "[[OTHER]]" on your photo
  • [[USERNAME]] commented "[[OTHER]]" on your video
  • [[USERNAME]] commented "[[OTHER]]" on your wall
  • [[USERNAME]] replied "[[OTHER]]" on your wall
  • [[USERNAME]] liked your profile
  • [[USERNAME]] liked your photo
  • [[USERNAME]] liked your video
  • Next Swipe Swipe