BALLS!

. . . the other part of what makes us males. There's any number of penis groups here on TN: large penises and small ones; circumcised/ uncircumcised, foreskin restoration, etc. However, there's none that I'm aware of having to do with testes. I've titled the Group "Balls" since, aside from at the doctor's office, it's the term most frequently used in referring to...

Photo censorship - how does it work?

Return to Discussions

I've tried on several occasions to upload a couple of photos.

One that was taken by a friend when I was repairing her computer: down on all fours, trying to plug in the power cords. She snapped me from behind with my balls clearly visible between my thighs. No hint of sexual activity, no parted bum cheeks, no erection, as a matter of fact no sight of my penis but the moderators refuse to allow the photo.

The second photo is, again from behind, of me bending over the sink doing the dishes, my legs slightly apart and my balls again clearly visible between them. No sexual innuendo, just a natural shot taken at the right time to show off my sac

I have seen some very explicit, sexually charged photos her on TN that I would probably query as potentially inappropriate for a nudist site but OK for a sex trolling site. Maybe the moderator/s don't have a decent set of nuts and are jealous of anyone over 60 who does?

This topic was edited
RE:Photo censorship - how does it work?

Cant see (pun intended) how your photos could be any more explicit than the crotch shot used as the groups photo (above). Ive had completely genital free nudes removed/not approved by mods on TN.

This post was edited
RE:Photo censorship - how does it work?

Hi,

Interesting that others have asked this too. Thanks for posting this,

I agree with the other reply, as you describe, the pics you submitted don't sound any 'different' than many I could easily find on here.

There was a post somewhere that mentions it is a tad subjective, and "can" depend on whomever assess it/them...

Maybe it's a request we should put in for an update - e.g. a reply to a refused pic (even if auto generated) to explain why - not only would members can then not make the same 'mistake', but also reduce the number of pics refused.

I've had several pics turned down, but later accepted - BUT in the the time it took to refuse all of them, several of friends viewed, and commented on, them.

And to add to the other reply, until recently a connection of mine had a picture of them performing oral sex as their profile pic!

B

This post was edited
RE:Photo censorship - how does it work?

Well how about that - I've just uploaded the same pics and they've made it into the Media section. Wonder if they'll still be there tomorrow?

This post was edited
RE:Photo censorship - how does it work?

Well there we go both pics taken down from this group and my profile and I can't work out why. There are some really sexually charged pics in the media section of this group and attached to members' profiles - there is nothing sexual in the 2 pics I've tried to upload - they just show my balls between my legs from behind. I just don't get it. Is there an administrator can contact on this site to find out why my photos are considered inappropriate for this site while others that drool sex not nudism aren't?

This post was edited
RE:Photo censorship - how does it work?

Well there we go both pics taken down from this group and my profile and I can't work out why. There are some really sexually charged pics in the media section of this group and attached to members' profiles - there is nothing sexual in the 2 pics I've tried to upload - they just show my balls between my legs from behind. I just don't get it. Is there an administrator can contact on this site to find out why my photos are considered inappropriate for this site while others that drool sex not nudism aren't?

Just checked the Balls group and there at least five photos like the ones you have been trying to post.

This post was edited