Elegant Nudist Ladies
Surely, like myself, many nudist ladies like to occasionally be elegant and admired. It may be for an evening in a resort, for your relevant other, for a dressed down or bottomless party... We know that elegant means at the minimum high heels, make-up and perfume. But it may mean also thigh highs, opera gloves, hats, fishnet or transparent dresses... That plus a smile. Nothing sexual, no crotch...
- created by Tallion
Another (real-life) dilemma
Return to DiscussionsI live in an apartment building in a posh area near the city centre. I only have a close neighbour on one side and he has a small window on that side. Yes, he did buy a big zoom during the lockdown, when I was sometimes opening the window to take some sun on my skin. I didn't mind it much, I normally use a semi-transparent shade so he doesn't see much and when he does... Well, such is life.
In front of my terrace there is only one posh administrative building about 100m away. The top floor, under the roof (still a couple floors lower than mine) is a small apartment (3 big windows) which I don't remember ever been occupied. But now they must have renovated it because a young couple moved in. I hardly ever see the guy but the girl has relatively similar schedule as mine, because I often see her in the morning, preparing to go out.
The middle window is their bedroom. Small room but huge window, almost full size, and no curtains or shads (yet). The girl is not shy, in the morning she comes out the shower (I guess, I don't see their bathroom) fully naked, blows her hair then she starts dressing up. All this with the light on and no curtain, 3m from the window. She probably believes that it's too far to see her and as she doesn't see her neighbours, they can't see her either. But neighbours have shades and curtains.
I happen to own one of those Nikkons with a huge 125x zoom. I think it's called P1000. Yes, the kind which, at maximum zooming in, can only capture half the moon. And yes, I am tempted to take pics of her.
Now, legally I am in my house and I can take pics inside and everything which neighbours show me is "public" so I don't think she could object, just like I don't object to my side neighbour, he doesn't even really hide, I even sometimes wave at him when he catches me naked. But I am quite rigorous with rights to image and it's not only about the law but also about morals. Now I wouldn't post those pics, but here is the question: is it morally ok to take pics of my neighbour without her knowledge simply because I am in my own house and she regularly shows herself naked in her own house?
I would say no, feels like an invasion of privacy, if you had her permission to take random pics then that's fine... if you were much closer, i.e. no need for high power zoom, then maybe OK as she should know she's visible and exhibiting... but, no from what you say... no.
Private Richie.
I think it's a fine line here. I think it's legal but not nice to take pics of my neighbour.
It's not really 100m away, maybe 70, and I wouldn't need my super zoom to capture her image. I can see her quite well with no magnifying device, she is slim, brunette but with very light pink nipples, she is fully shaved - unless she sports a really tiny landing strip... So no, she is not exactly shy and she probably knows that she is fully visible.
I don't really know where to draw the line. If I take a pic of the building with my phone and then blow it up would this be ok? My phone also has an optical zoom, if I use it would it still the fine? Or, knowing that there is a nude lady in that building I should avoid taking pics of that building altogether? Where does the invasion of privacy become too much and immoral? As said, we take the use of the pic off the table. I'm not publishing it, I just admire it a bit and then delete it. Of course, what does "a bit" mean? A second? Two? A minute? An hour? A year? Does the time of being in possession of her unauthorised nude pic count?
I dare say it's an invasion. Standing in front of your uncovered window is exactly what she desires; if someone spots her, so what; she is definitely comfortable displaying herself; like you and me, when exercising.
Posting photos of her online is another story.
Oh this is way too easy. Its a no no !
Just because she is not shy about having curtains on her windows. Does not mean that she wants people to take pictures of her. Its her apartment ! Yes your place looks into hers, but does that give you the right to invade her apartment. She did not build the apartments. They are what we have to live in. Close together in a city.
I know that people love to watch other peoples lives. But taking the time to Capture moments in someones life and posting them. Thats very wrong ! Or using those moments to satisfy their own desires. Thats even more wrong !
Could you send a message to their place, saying that we all have the ability to see inside your living space. Hmmm. Could you be starting something bad for yourself ? Or should you not be invading someones place with out them knowing. Or is she enjoying her life the way it is but doesnt want others throwing it into her face.
What about her other half ? Do you like watching him ? What would D say about you watching and taking pictures of a male neighbor ? But theres the real statement. Neighbor ! Hmmm I still think No is answer. Darn it, I do like watching others also. But its not right !
The variety of answers is very interesting. It means it was a good dilemma. My opinion is that it wouldn't be illegal to take pics; on the contrary, what she does is actually illegal, I could call the police on her.
On the the other hand, what she does is not immoral (if you don't like sexy nude young ladies, just don't look! She is quite far, you need to look on purpose to see her) but my taking pics of her would be.
Just one of those situations where morality and legality are completely reversed...
Maybe I should also open my curtain and keep the light on so she can see me nude and understand that she is exposed? I don't think there is anyone else in that building before 9 am and the next row is what? 300m away.