Nude Celebrity

Group for all who like to watch and admire the famous people naked.

Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Return to Discussions

I'm not at all a fan of the Kardashian/Jenner Clan. But I was surprised in a good way by Kendall Jenner's nude set by Russell James. The pics are very artistic, tastefully done; and Kendall is beautifully nude. Reminds me a little of the Chrissy Teigen photoshoot from a while back.






This topic was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Her body is actually wonderful. Presumably all natural aside from her stereotypical Kardashian lips, of course, which I remain skeptical about... aside from that... this photoshoot has made me a fan.

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

It turns out...she may not have been completely nude during the photoshoot. Evidence has been presented by astute observers that she may have just been topless, with her bikini bottom photoshopped off.

If it is true, it's just sad. It only reinforces the "fakeness" of the Kardashian/Jenner clan.

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Well, I certainly wouldn't put the possibility of Photoshop out of my mind. They've been known to doctor many images to make their bodies more endearing, so it doesn't surprise me... at this point, image manipulation is to be expected.

My point of contention is somehow elevating the idea that showing the vagina somehow makes the image more lewd than previously. It's a bit of a silly standard to set when we've all just accepted that once a vagina is shown, the image is pornographic, so even in an image where 95% of her nude body is shown or implied, the "sanctity" of the vagina remains in tact. I suppose I just find it odd and interesting.

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Not only that; but they are ways and techniques of photographing a "full nude" without bringing any focus to the vagina. Take this pic by Kendall's infamous sister, for example: she is clearly completely naked; yet the body position, the filtering used and the angle of the photo actually bring very little attention to her vagina.

It's ridiculous to "fake" complete nudity. If you're going for a nude photoshoot: be nude. If you're only comfortable posing topfree: just be topfree.

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Lucky horse

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Very beautiful! I would love to pose on a horse for a photoshoot.... that'd be so amazing!!!!

xoxo,
amy

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

It's ridiculous to "fake" complete nudity. If you're going for a nude photoshoot: be nude. If you're only comfortable posing topfree: just be topfree.

I couldn't agree more.

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

This is much better than having Caitlyn Jenner pose.

I'd still like to see that... for the sake of curiosity. ;-D

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

thanks for sharing a few more of this shoot... really love the closeup of her running on the beach....

and yeah, i know that beach... or one much like it in northern california...
did several artsy nude shoots on grey days there a while back, including one riding bareback....
and btw, the pacific ocean temp is often mid-50's and rarely over 60f... brrrrr....

This post was edited
RE:Kendall Jenner photoshoot from Russell James Angels book

Very beautiful! I would love to pose on a horse for a photoshoot.... that'd be so amazing!!!!xoxo,amy

amy if ur serious, you can rent horses nearby and ride or pose 'bareback' on muir beach,
which is traditionally clothes optional just north of the golden gate bridge and south of stinson beach....

cheers, uncle jake

This post was edited