Thanks for the reply Swifthawk. Didn't think it would have been removed because of content, but I guess it could be. So you are saying I don't get a notification if I get flagged? I'd like to know if I have offended someone........stan
Hehe...I'd like to be notified too, however, 10,000+ members, one admin, probably doesn't have the time. lol
MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY! I have seen multiple photos of women with their that are "headleass" and I do understand some what for harrasment reasons and a few men are headless. I have talked to another member who had his picture nixed because the photo only showed the lower have of his face while the rest of him was nude. In my OPINION the ADMINISTRATOR has DOUBLE STANDARDS. For males, if the photo doesn't have the full face it will automatically get nixed. If it is a woman, full face not required. I understand life isn't fair, but come on we all claim to be adults on this site. Let us act accordingly and stop behaving like people in junior high (middle schoolers).
Hehe...I don't think it's a case of double standards. I get the impression that TT1 deletes photo's as they are brought to his attention. Unfortuantely more people complain about male photo's than female ones. lol...Probably because the female ones are a bit more pleasing on the eye, but unless people start flagging them, what's he going to do and still keep the costs of running this site down?
I guess the only thing we can really do is post our pics within the guidelines and if we see a pic (regardless of sex) that we don't agree with, flag it.
Another site we belong to, has a series of volunteers, or "Photo Moderators" to help with the sorting of photos. It isn't perfect, but people can still flag photos that get by them if needs be. Perhaps we need that here. It's certainly too much for one person.
I think this would be an excellent idea. It must take tons of time for one person to view every single photograph just from new member applications, not to mention the Gallery. Perhaps it would free up time to give some attention to the Locations page!
The Gallery is not a feature that I find to be of all that much importance. I did try to upload a couple of photos which were in accordance with the guidelines but which were never added so I pretty much lost interest in it. Just from the random gallery that appears on the home page it doesnt look like that feature is a large priority either as the same pictures seem to come up again and again, ad nauseam. So yes, a photo moderator group I think would be a great addition. That would likely curb many of the complaints too as I think people would see that as a more fair system than one person making the decision on every photo.
Come on Sam, tell us how you really feel. LOL Seriously, in what way do you mean your comment? Do you feel this way because you dont think photos should be posted on the site at all or that you disagree with the posting policies? I'd just like to understand your perspective.
The answer is simple: The first pic you post, must be of you, after that you have free reign... There's no pic of you on your profile...
Photo Guidelines..Please follow them
1. Your profile photo must contain you. Afterwards you may upload any photos you like
Steve
i have sent that picture but it was rejected i dont get why it was there no explaination of its rejection.
Was the picture of you? Did it follow the basic guidelines of picture posting? If so, is it possible the file size was too large? We doubt you'll get an explanation as there is just one person running the entire site who probably doesn't have time to explain why each and every pic that get's rejected does so.Try a different picture and see if that works...
Jen
i have my partners pic in here, we dont like to show our faces to people in any site as we have friends that dont know we are nudists,me mostly wife home nudist,well i put hers on no head, showing everything eles,i put mine up and was deleted,so i put 2 more in and they were deleted ,mmmmmmmmm something not right,as you say guidlines ,there are not anythat are consistant.
talking of ass pics,what about a lady in here that has her ass pic and also showing her vagina in it from the back,also female leg spread i must admit she is showing her face but where do you draw the line,nothing offends me except idiots.
i have my partners pic in here, we dont like to show our faces to people in any site as we have friends that dont know we are nudists,me mostly wife home nudist,well i put hers on no head, showing everything eles,i put mine up and was deleted,so i put 2 more in and they were deleted ,mmmmmmmmm something not right,as you say guidlines ,there are not anythat are consistant.
talking of ass pics,what about a lady in here that has her ass pic and also showing her vagina in it from the back,also female leg spread i must admit she is showing her face but where do you draw the line,nothing offends me except idiots.
Under the photo guidelines, rule five clearly states; "As of 1/7/09 we are no longer approving pictures that contain only genitals,
If you choose not to show your face then you may not show your genitals".
That seems clear enough to me. It's your choice if you do not wish to show your face. You should not expect to show only the parts you want to show. You don't make the rules here.Apparently the person that made the rules decided that you should show all or nothing. If your wife's headless pic slipped past, then that is probably an error rather than an inconsistency.
I did notice that the pics you used as examples belonged to people you have listed as your friends. If those pics do not offend you, what are you complaining about? Those people showed their faces. That is the entire difference between them and you, as I see it.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!