UN
underguy2Autor original
Jul 3, 2013....... proponents and gun nuts don't seem to care much about the 4th Amendment. Are you happy to have the NSA recording everything you do, say, write etc?
ReaccionarResponderSuscribirse
Respuestas
- MA
Jul 3, 201327 posts since rejoining this site and he still has a blank profile.ReaccionarResponder - MAJul 3, 2013
[img src="http://patrick.ripp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ignore_him-366x400.jpg">
ReaccionarResponder - MAJul 3, 2013[quote]Love that photo, great for reference to a blank profile...[/quote]Yes Razor, it is a good one. I could not resist posting that.ReaccionarResponder
- CH
Jul 3, 2013[quote][img src="http://patrick.ripp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ignore_him-366x400.jpg">[/quote]Wish I could click on a like button for this. It's precious in all ways.ReaccionarResponder - NU
Jul 3, 2013[quote]Was that spoon under a new name?[/quote]Another blank profile.ReaccionarResponder - UNunderguy2Autor originalJul 5, 2013
Hmmm, not a single post on topic. Says a lot about the posters here.
ReaccionarResponder - RE
Jul 5, 2013[quote]Hmmm, not a single post on topic. Says a lot about the posters here.[/quote]Says more about the lack of concern in the USA of their Govt spying on all they do. Imagine, many nudists will now be exposed to data collection by their own, for security reasons. A problem with lurkers and lookylou's - this is the ultimate!ReaccionarResponder - DAJul 5, 2013[quote][quote]Hmmm, not a single post on topic. Says a lot about the posters here.[/quote]Says more about the lack of concern in the USA of their Govt spying on all they do. Imagine, many nudists will now be exposed to data collection by their own, for security reasons. A problem with lurkers and lookylou's - this is the ultimate![/quote] Nope, Obama says it ain't so. And we know he'd never lie.ReaccionarResponder
- REJul 5, 2013[quote]....... proponents and gun nuts don't seem to care much about the 4th Amendment. Are you happy to have the NSA recording everything you do, say, write etc?[/quote]It will all be OK, they will have a gun to defend themselves..................Well that is until some one looks into the data and finds that phone call where they said jokingly "I'd kill for a look like that" - Psyche test failed = NO gun licence.
LOLReaccionarResponder - UNunderguy2Autor originalJul 6, 2013[quote][quote][quote]Hmmm, not a single post on topic. Says a lot about the posters here.[/quote]Says more about the lack of concern in the USA of their Govt spying on all they do. Imagine, many nudists will now be exposed to data collection by their own, for security reasons. A problem with lurkers and lookylou's - this is the ultimate![/quote] Nope, Obama says it ain't so. And we know he'd never lie.
[/quote]It's not a party issue. It's been going on since way before Obama. And will go on after Obama, whether you vote Donkey or Elephant.ReaccionarResponder - UNunderguy2Autor originalJul 6, 2013[quote]Obama is just the figurehead of a cultural problem. [/quote]A global problem. We're all being constantly surveilled and all our governments are complicit.
So what is it all for?
Certainly not security.ReaccionarResponder - MAJul 6, 2013
[img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xOuQw4MPf4I/Ty2VzRZMdGI/AAAAAAAAAts/pyAtMgZjmV8/s1600/big%20brother.jpg">
ReaccionarResponder - TH
Jul 6, 2013If Paul Revere wasn't spying he would not have known the British were coming.ReaccionarResponder - SO
Jul 14, 2013"You insult gun owners in your OP and then whine because they don't deem you worthy of a response. Boy, I'd infinitely rather trust my life to an American gun owner than to a thousand craven leftists."
Said by Cranky McCrankersten at the 1930 World's Fair.ReaccionarResponder - DE
Jul 15, 2013This isn't just about the 2nd Amendment. BHO wants to shred the Constitution. Weather you consider yourself left, right or center, the Constitution is designed to protect the smallest minority. That is a minority of one. This is too valuable a document to toss aside just because you do not completely agree with one or another part of it.ReaccionarResponder - REJul 16, 2013
It is not the person or party in your White House who wants to shred the Constitution - it is the 'people' who are complacent.
ReaccionarResponder - SOJul 16, 2013
Not everything written over 200 years ago is still applicable. But keep trying.
ReaccionarResponder - DEJul 17, 2013[quote]
Not everything written over 200 years ago is still applicable. But keep trying.[/quote]That's why it's been amended 27 times but which parts do you feel are no longer applicable. Please be specific.ReaccionarResponder - DEJul 17, 2013[quote]
It is not the person or party in your White House who wants to shred the Constitution - it is the 'people' who are complacent.[/quote]The present occupant of the White House is bending laws to fit his agenda, enforcing some laws while ignoring others and pushing legislation that is clearly un-constitutional. Yes there are people who are cheering him on led by a media that refuses to report anything that reflects negatively upon this individual. People who do speak up are punished by this government for doing so. If this stands, it will surely undermine the effectiveness of the Constitution thereby rendering it null and void.ReaccionarResponder