Capital Shooting, Oct. 3 - Anything Else em True Nudists

Oct 3, 2013

Still confused about the details. Supposedly this woman rammed a barricade, but pictures of her car afterwards show a front end in pristine condition. Did she ram it in reverse?

ReagirResponderInscrever-se

Respostas

MA
ManOfWicklow
Oct 14, 2013
[quote]Who shall control the guns?[/quote]Government imbeciles.
ReagirResponder
MA
ManOfWicklow
Oct 14, 2013
[quote][quote][quote]Who shall control the guns?[/quote]Government imbeciles.[/quote]Then how do you have "sensible" gun control?[/quote]Exactly, you don't and never can.
ReagirResponder
ME
Membro
Oct 14, 2013
[quote][quote][quote][quote]Who shall control the guns?[/quote]Government imbeciles.[/quote]Then how do you have "sensible" gun control?[/quote]Exactly, you don't and never can.[/quote]Not true-you can have sensible gun control:
If you have been convicted of a violent crime, if you are a habitual drug offender, if you suffer with certain mental illnesses, if you are a 'anti-gun' Democrat like Feinstein, then you are not permitted to own or possess a weapon.
If you do so illegally, then you go to prison for five years.
If you do so during the commission of a crime, then your prison term beyond the other crime is an additional twenty five years.
ReagirResponder
MA
ManOfWicklow
Oct 14, 2013
[quote]Not true-you can have sensible gun control:
If you have been convicted of a violent crime, if you are a habitual drug offender, if you suffer with certain mental illnesses, if you are a 'anti-gun' Democrat like Feinstein, then you are not permitted to own or possess a weapon.
If you do so illegally, then you go to prison for five years.
If you do so during the commission of a crime, then your prison term beyond the other crime is an additional twenty five years.[/quote]Oh yes, and with all the thousands of gun deaths every year, it is certainly working.
ReagirResponder
TH
thomasstierney
Oct 14, 2013
[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Who shall control the guns?[/quote]Government imbeciles.[/quote]Then how do you have "sensible" gun control?[/quote]Exactly, you don't and never can.[/quote]Not true-you can have sensible gun control:
If you have been convicted of a violent crime, if you are a habitual drug offender, if you suffer with certain mental illnesses, if you are a 'anti-gun' Democrat like Feinstein, then you are not permitted to own or possess a weapon.
If you do so illegally, then you go to prison for five years.
If you do so during the commission of a crime, then your prison term beyond the other crime is an additional twenty five years.
[/quote]That is not "Gun Control" That is people control.
ReagirResponder
TH
thomasstierney
Oct 14, 2013
[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Who shall control the guns?[/quote]Government imbeciles.[/quote]Then how do you have "sensible" gun control?[/quote]Exactly, you don't and never can.[/quote]Not true-you can have sensible gun control:
If you have been convicted of a violent crime, if you are a habitual drug offender, if you suffer with certain mental illnesses, if you are a 'anti-gun' Democrat like Feinstein, then you are not permitted to own or possess a weapon.
If you do so illegally, then you go to prison for five years.
If you do so during the commission of a crime, then your prison term beyond the other crime is an additional twenty five years.
[/quote]That is not "Gun Control" That is people control.[/quote]@bruce to use a worn out phrase, since when have criminals obeyed the law?@thomas People control IS the end game and the ends justify the means.[/quote]You want to control people? Seems I remember a war that theory caused.
ReagirResponder
DE
DesertRat
Oct 14, 2013
A while back we had a "lively" discussion on gun control and the 2nd amendment. Why are we going over these issues again? Has anything changed?
ReagirResponder
TH
thomasstierney
Oct 14, 2013
Oh! Was the problem solved?
ReagirResponder
DE
DesertRat
Oct 14, 2013
I thought the problem was solved on December 15, 1791. That is the date the Bill of Rights was ratified.
ReagirResponder
SO
Soupie
Oct 14, 2013
And slavery was legal then. Still in favour of that? Do you live in 1791?
ReagirResponder
TH
thomasstierney
Oct 14, 2013
[quote]A while back we had a "lively" discussion on gun control and the 2nd amendment. Why are we going over these issues again? Has anything changed?[/quote]"A while back we had a "lively" discussion on:"Erections -ShavedGenitals -Driving Nude -Cooking Nude -Exposing ones self to the neighbors -Answering the door naked. -And Maaany more. -Shall we refrain from "going over these issues again?"OR Should we check with you first before we go over past issues?

ReagirResponder
DE
DesertRat
Oct 15, 2013
[quote]

And slavery was legal then. Still in favour of that? Do you live in 1791?[/quote]

Slave states also had laws that prohibited blacks from owning or using guns. Why was that? They knew that an armed slave was no longer a slave. The reason the founders of this Nation provided for the ownership of guns by the populace was because they knew that unarmed citizens would be at the mercy of a tyrannical government.

It is human nature that those in power will seek to increase their power in all ways possible. That innate desire is offset by the checks and balances provided by our Constitution. One of those checks is the second amendment.
ReagirResponder
SO
Soupie
Oct 15, 2013
Your argument leaves out any civilizing factor in society. It assumes that people are still basically neanderthal.
ReagirResponder
ME
Membro
Oct 15, 2013
[quote]Your argument leaves out any civilizing factor in society. It assumes that people are still basically neanderthal. [/quote]Proof of power corrupting is rampant throughout history-and so it is the government that should be considered inclined to being uncivil once the law abiding citizen is disarmed.
But, Soupie; the positions of those who oppose the Second Amendment leaves out civilizing factors in society and assumes people are basically neanderthals. That law abiding citizens are not responsible-shall we say not evolved sufficiently-to be trusted with firearms. It assumes that only those in power-those who are subject to the temptation of corruption-should be trusted with firearms.
ReagirResponder
SO
Soupie
Oct 15, 2013
"I'm not here to argue with you, so kindly leave me the hell alone"
ReagirResponder
DE
DesertRat
Oct 15, 2013
[quote]

Your argument leaves out any civilizing factor in society. It assumes that people are still basically neanderthal. [/quote]I don't know who said it but I believe it's true. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
ReagirResponder
SO
Soupie
Oct 16, 2013
I was just restating the obvious as well Gassy.
ReagirResponder
DA
DanandJanetteAutor original
Oct 16, 2013
[quote][quote] Video of police car striking pop up barrier, causing the horrendous damage to it, seen in many pictures. Many stories implied the woman caused this damage by striking the vehicle herself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ao3617loZ0k
[/quote]Thanks for posting this[/quote] My pleasure. Knowledge is power.
ReagirResponder