Classic propaganda, I bet Bruce records it for his kids
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4697281
OK I found the link for what I was watching when I wrote this
Respostas
- DE
May 17, 2011[quote]Classic propaganda, I bet Bruce records it for his kids lol.[/quote] Tonybooth; You lost me here. What are you trying to say? While you're at it, could you go back to your original post and correct the spelling? You really don't need a spell checker to figure out how to spell Fox.ReagirResponder - TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 18, 2011
http://www.desmogblog.com/dan-gainor
http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/?funderID=3
Financed by big Oil and climate change deniers.
The Sarah Scaife Foundation is financed by the Mellon industrial, oil,
and banking fortune. At one time, its largest single holding was stock
in the Gulf Oil Corporation. The foundation became active in funding
conservative causes in 1973, when Richard Mellon Scaife became chairman.
Forbes magazine has estimated Scaife's personal net worth at $800
million, making him the 138th richest person in the U.S. He controls the
Scaife, Carthage, and Allegheny foundations. In 1993, Scaife and
Carthage reportedly gave more than $17.6 million to 150 conservative
think tanks. As of December 31, 1992, Scaife assets were $212,232,888
and Carthage assets were $11,937,862.
just buy another opinion, fine Bruce with Murdoch he simply owns the whole thing, no wonder his poor old mother is constantly embarassed.ReagirResponder - TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 25, 2011[quote]
[/quote]
Well the President looks more presidential everyday and what does Fox do, no commentary no mention of the speech given to a joint sitting of parliament, instead a couple of minutes to mock a toast given to bettty windsor when they started playing the national anthem, how pathetic, Bruce you have no defence for this disgrace and incompetence. Totally inept and that insane Hannity "interviewing" the guy who wrote a book against Palin, he uses all the tricks you accuse Liberals of. Again biased unbalanced and in his case unhinged even BoR finds him ridiculous and replusive.ReagirResponder - RO
May 26, 2011[quote][quote]Classic propaganda, I bet Bruce records it for his kids lol.[/quote] Tonybooth; You lost me here. What are you trying to say? While you're at it, could you go back to your original post and correct the spelling? You really don't need a spell checker to figure out how to spell Fox.[/quote] Desert Rat, On my computer at the heading it says FOX. Perhaps he started another posting and I missed it.ReagirResponder - ROMay 26, 2011[quote][quote][/quote]
Well the President looks more presidential everyday and what does Fox do, no commentary no mention of the speech given to a joint sitting of parliament, instead a couple of minutes to mock a toast given to bettty windsor when they started playing the national anthem, how pathetic, Bruce you have no defence for this disgrace and incompetence. Totally inept and that insane Hannity "interviewing" the guy who wrote a book against Palin, he uses all the tricks you accuse Liberals of. Again biased unbalanced and in his case unhinged even BoR finds him ridiculous and replusive.[/quote]
Obama is way out of his class. His friends are thugs, preachers who preach hate, Black Panthers who yell kill white people. The Queen is in a different crowd of people than he is.
What person keeps records of another person for years unless it is to make money off that person later. Hannity asked him if he was going to make money off of the book and the guy did not want to answer, but said yes. Hannity feels he should give the money to charity since he did not write the book for money. The author of the book is a scumbag who wants to make a lot of money at someone else expense.ReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 26, 2011[quote][quote][quote][/quote]
Well the President looks more presidential everyday and what does Fox do, no commentary no mention of the speech given to a joint sitting of parliament, instead a couple of minutes to mock a toast given to bettty windsor when they started playing the national anthem, how pathetic, Bruce you have no defence for this disgrace and incompetence. Totally inept and that insane Hannity "interviewing" the guy who wrote a book against Palin, he uses all the tricks you accuse Liberals of. Again biased unbalanced and in his case unhinged even BoR finds him ridiculous and replusive.[/quote]
Obama is way out of his class. His friends are thugs, preachers who preach hate, Black Panthers who yell kill white people. The Queen is in a different crowd of people than he is.
What person keeps records of another person for years unless it is to make money off that person later. Hannity asked him if he was going to make money off of the book and the guy did not want to answer, but said yes. Hannity feels he should give the money to charity since he did not write the book for money. The author of the book is a scumbag who wants to make a lot of money at someone else expense.[/quote]
Hannity is the scumbag and beneath contempt as he just hectored the guy gave him no chance to answer and of course he will never ask Sarah Palin proper journalistic questions because he is incapable of doing so. So you have no interest in knowing what an insider can reveal of this charade of a woman? Typical and people outside the US wonder why your country is so bitterly divided.
Bill O'reilly makes it clear that they are in it to make money and that is far enough, just be honest and admit that is the ethos for the whole rotten movement, just because you are naive doesn't mean that you can't keep your faith but open your mind to the possibility she is no saint and deserves greater scrutiny.ReagirResponder
- BE
May 26, 2011Hello Bruce. You sound very intelligent and articulate and I like your passion (I am not saying I agree - or disagree - I am just saying you sound very authoriative on the things of which you speak). So having said that, could you please look at removing LOL from your reportage? Any time I hear that I expect the next words to be "so, I totally, like, went to the mall and got this real awesome, like, up-do". It doesn't help your hard worked for credibility. - I hope I didn't spell anything wrong
ReagirResponder - BEMay 26, 2011
Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "
ReagirResponder - TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 27, 2011Hannity is a conservative-and proudly biased commentator. He does not present himself as a non-biased journalist (like Amanpour, Dennis the Menace on MTP, Bob Schieffer, Katie Couric, et al) Hannity, by the way gives a lot of airtime to liberals. Regularly; Like Beckel. Once again, my friend; your argument falls flat.[/quote] Hannity fell flat because BiBi actually put him in his place explained the 67 borders with land swaps and was almost apologetic for his bad behaviour lecturing Obama. Many liberal Jews dislike BiBi instensely and believe allowing rampatant settlements to be built as bad policy endangering their own security. Hannity interviewed the guy who wrote the book (on Palin)and just yelled over him, you ask why people don't go on the network simply because the host can't restrain their hatred disdain and own bias, they foam at the mouth, talk over their guest and want to belittle and humilate them, Fair and balanced, no unhinged rabid right wing looneys, Greta on the other hand actually treats her journalism seriously. So its either blonde bimbos, Food 101 or a bitter twisted old conservative guy or a college drop out. Poor old Rupert he used to buy quality respectable newspapers now he just funds an unabashed right wing rabble.ReagirResponder
- DAMay 27, 2011[quote][quote][quote][/quote] Well the President looks more presidential everyday and what does Fox do, no commentary no mention of the speech given to a joint sitting of parliament,[/quote] Looks more Presidential? Like when he is glaring at Netanyahu while Bibi is dressing him down publicly in the Oral Orifice? Or when he is appeasing terrorists? Or when he is ignoring the slaughter in Syria....saying that Assad should lead the country to democracy? Or when he takes a back seat in Libya? That's presidential leadership? I saw a report popping up about the speech in England, I believe Bret Baier's show had it, but I didn't listen to the full report. I just now tried to find it quickly, but stumbled on this-seems pretty F & B to me-almost a fluff piece for the prez.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/23/obama-begins-european-tour-ireland-discovers-irish-roots/[quote] [/quote] [quote][quote]instead a couple of minutes to mock a toast given to bettty windsor when they started playing the national anthem, how pathetic, Bruce you have no defence for this disgrace and incompetence.[/quote] [/quote] Again, sorry just heard something in passing about him not timing his toast well or something. Actually, I think I heard that on the radio, not Fox. So, it's ok for the MSM (and by the way, Fox) to point out Bush's verbal flops but not Obama's? C'mon, grow a skin. [quote][quote]Totally inept and that insane Hannity "interviewing" the guy who wrote a book against Palin, he uses all the tricks you accuse Liberals of. Again biased unbalanced and in his case unhinged even BoR finds him ridiculous and replusive.[/quote] [/quote] Hannity is a conservative-and proudly biased commentator. He does not present himself as a non-biased journalist (like Amanpour, Dennis the Menace on MTP, Bob Schieffer, Katie Couric, et al) Hannity, by the way gives a lot of airtime to liberals. Regularly; Like Beckel. Once again, my friend; your argument falls flat.[/quote] Can you imagine the field day the media would have if Bush signed and dated a guestbook that was off by three years?ReagirResponder
- DAMay 27, 2011[quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] lol.[/quote] You rascal, you. (wink)ReagirResponder
- DAMay 27, 2011[quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] You DO realize she never said this, right?ReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 27, 2011[quote][quote]Bullshit... get off the kool-aid[/quote] Who me? Please explain- I know that you like to come in, throw a totally indefensible bomb, and run away. Care to elaborate?[/quote] In Australia we would say you have been on the turps or of course cordial, lime with a twist of lemon or lime...so btw how is summer going or late spring??ReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 27, 2011[quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] You DO realize she never said this, right?[/quote] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nLmYrSv-S8&NR=1&feature=fvwp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyo4JDbJJ4&feature=related Finally a balanced approach Sarah and Hillary - enjoyReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 27, 2011[quote][quote][quote][/quote] Hannity is the scumbag and beneath contempt as he just hectored the guy[/quote] Take a look at these two clips. Seems to me that Hannity presents a respectable position in both clips. No hectoring there. MSNBC's Ed Schultz's audio in the second... is that acceptable, Tony?http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html#/v/962095739001/white-house-creates-web-police-post-part-1/?playlist_id=86924http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html#/v/962095738001/white-house-creates-web-police-post-part-2/?playlist_id=86924[/quote] I saw this live the first link has nothing to do with the book interview??? no look at the part 1 interview you re full of crap etc he just talks over the guy.............over over and over again When did I defend the other guy who gave a grovelling apology? Stick to the point now you are just throwing bombs? this is rather pointless. Hm listening to your favourite guys talk about taxes, they need to review Bush's actual view on voodoo economics, the equation is pretty simple, cutting revenue blew out the deficit, its not rocket science, when do people actually critique this crazy idea? Ideology triumphs over facts. Now the Fox extra cute dogs great lol!!ReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 27, 2011[quote][quote][quote][quote]Bullshit... get off the kool-aid[/quote] Who me? Please explain- I know that you like to come in, throw a totally indefensible bomb, and run away. Care to elaborate?[/quote] In Australia we would say you have been on the turps or of course cordial, lime with a twist of lemon or lime...so btw how is summer going or late spring??[/quote] In other words, drunk. Actually the Kool-Aid thing is more insulting (for those with a thin skin) I suppose because it refers to the followers of Jim Jones who blindly followed his orders to commit suicide. But both sides do it; I don't think it's a big deal. Our friend from Cali never offers any intelligent thoughts anyway.[/quote] http://www.raptureready.com/rr-kool-aid.html Hm thank you my friend always layers beneath, OMG please ask the fox guys to play some decent music, lol I have to mute or change channels!!! A guy here on Sky news just used the Kool aid reference in disucssing today's politics always learning something. They are discussing an ad campaign promoting a carbon tax and being a News organisation pointed out News Corp attempts to be carbon neutral how ironicReagirResponder
- BEMay 27, 2011[quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] You DO realize she never said this, right?[/quote] You DO realise Australia is not near Germany right? Don't patronise me and I won't patronise you. BTW capitals are a bit like LOL's - it creates loss of credibilityReagirResponder
- TOtonyboothAutor originalMay 28, 2011[quote][quote][quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] You DO realize she never said this, right?[/quote] You DO realise Australia is not near Germany right? Don't patronise me and I won't patronise you. BTW capitals are a bit like LOL's - it creates loss of credibility[/quote] I am sorry, my friend, but...huh?[/quote] Bruce I don't think this was directed at you............and no I can't see Germany out of my window either :)ReagirResponder
- DAMay 28, 2011[quote][quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] You DO realize she never said this, right?[/quote] You DO realise Australia is not near Germany right? Don't patronise me and I won't patronise you. BTW capitals are a bit like LOL's - it creates loss of credibility[/quote] That story of her seeing Russia from her back yard is very often repeated as fact, when in actuality she didn't say it. Would you enjoy having an assanine quote attributed to you as fact? I saw nothing in your post that indicated to me you knew it was an urban myth. My my, you seem to have quite a chip on your shoulder. And a laundry list of issues too. No caps, no lol's, I'm sure there are plenty more. Why don't you list them all here so no one else steps in it with you.ReagirResponder
- MEMembroMay 28, 2011
Tony, good post. If you want to go a step farther, take a look at
two documentaries, Why We Fight and Inside Job. In Why We Fight, we
hear from Eisenhower and his famous warning of the Military-Industrial
complex and why he saw it as a threat to democracy. We are shown how
that industry, in the beginning, by-passed Congress by dealing directly
with the Pentagon. In Inside Job, we can put together how Wall Street
learned from that industry, and then took it farther by simply buying
Congress and the executive office and apparently now, through the
executive branch, the judiciary as well.Once at this point, you will recognize that we are all being
herded along, with our prejudices dictating which news show we watch to
support our biases. We are distracted, debating which of the bought
candidates are the better choice for some political office. All the
while, the underlying problem, financial and political corruption, goes
on unhindered.
It leads some to argue that in the war, capitalism v. democracy, capitalism is going to win, if it hasn't already. That this outcome will have a profound impact on individual freedom and opportunity, goes on unappreciated.
If we look for an example, we need look no further than our own
history, say 1875 to 1934, and what unregulated capitalism did to the
individual worker. It is a fascinating and scary study.ReagirResponder - BEMay 28, 2011
My apologies DanandJanette, I will try to explain as best I can without using the quote on quote function, I am sure people can go back if they are interested.
By you capitalising (we use s's not z's) the word do it gave the impression you were making a supercilious statement rather than asking a question.
I found this a little patronising. I then drew a very long bow to suggest that, like is often joked about regarding North Americans, that they are so wrapped up in their own continent that they have been known to mistake Australia (where I come from) with Austria. Obviously suggesting someone thinking this way is a very patronising statement. In hindsight it was too obscure and not very well thought out, I apologise.
I do know Tina Fey is responsible for the infamous "from my house" quote and I should of made you aware of this.
Just for 100% clarity, Sarah Palin's actual quote was "They're our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska." she made this quote whilst highlighting her foreign policy credentials - just in case you didn't think I knew. There was nothing asinine in that one.
I hope this removes some confusion.
Now let's get back on topic, my apologies to everyone for steering us of courseReagirResponder - BEMay 28, 2011[quote][quote]Sorry I couldn't resist this:- Why did he have to be so obvious as to rent the house next door? Why didn't he just rent a place in Russia? Because you know "You can see ........... "[/quote] lol.[/quote] Very clever BruceReagirResponder
