videos

Replies

• RE

  

  Red_Wolf

  Jan 12, 2012

  Actually wouldn't have mattered.  I carefully encoded a video multiple times before I uploaded it to get the balance of compact and quality, but then the site here re-encoded it to a low-res, highly artifacted and badly pixellated thumbnail that looked like a first generation You Tube video from years ago.  Not good.  So my feeling now is, I'm not going to waste a lot of time doing a quality encode if it's going to end up like that.
  
  I DO wish we could have a site with at least You Tube quality that would allow posting of nudist, non-pornographic videos.  Plenty of sites for posting self-done porn (X-Tube) but the legit sites, like You Tube, won't allow ANY nudity -- so no sites of quality for those of us who want to upload videos of non-sexual nudist activity.
  
  

  ReactReply