How acceptable are Body Mods in the general nudist population. I am new to the big picture having only practiced nudity with a small social group (35 to 45) locally. We have lots of piercings and tatoo's that vary per individual (some none, some a few, nobodys overdone). My favorite mod and the one this question is about involves genital vacuum pumping. I enjoy having my ball sack pumped to a large size. Would other nudists consider this freakish? I haven't posted any pictures as yet until I feel comfortable with how I will be perceived. I will be glad to post pictures before pumping but pumped is more the real me. Please guide me so I am not out of place. Thanks
Replies
- JH
Apr 17, 2009I think that I would be more concerned about the potential long term medical damage that pumping can do to either your testicles or penis. To me pumping does not achieve anything close to a natural look and thus becomes just an obvious exageration. I have a friend who is nicely endowed put still pumps to achieve what he perceives to be a more masculine look which in reality turns out to be rather grotesque.
ReactReply - BABaldwinOriginal PosterApr 17, 2009
I agree the extreme look is rather freaky. I don't go that far.
ReactReply - CA
Apr 18, 2009I'd agree with Nudrunr too, but I havent' the time to read his whole post! (aside: Nud, ya gotta summarize for the rest of us!) I have never even heard of pumping testicles! Mine change in size by the hour. Whether I'm hot or cold or active, it never even occurs to me to worry about their size. One woman at a nude pool party told me I had a small penis. OK, the pool was pretty nippy! I just told her that, ya know what sweetheart? They're made to change! It seems pretty silly to say that when they're pumped, it's the real you. C'mon, relax, take off your clothes and stop staring at yourself in the mirror.
ReactReply - BABaldwinOriginal PosterApr 18, 2009
excellent response, the light has come on for me. I see your point clearly. In my case, I haven't been pierced and should I get any genital jewelry I will only display it in an appropriate setting. Not here. As far as pumping "large" I understand again the attention, negative and otherwise, it might draw. Again in my case, I doubt anyone would know I was pumped as I only pump enough to appear normal size.
Thanks a great deal for all the responses, I am so glad I asked the question as I have good picture of the scope of the site. I will enjoy being a member with all the wonderful people on here.
BaldwinReactReply - OC
Apr 19, 2009Having been here a short while it is so refreshing to read these forums and get a true nudist perspective...a far cry from other sites. Thank you all
ReactReply - UK
Apr 20, 2009[quote]How acceptable are Body Mods in the general nudist population. I am new to the big picture having only practiced nudity with a small social group (35 to 45) locally. We have lots of piercings and tatoo's that vary per individual (some none, some a few, nobodys overdone). My favorite mod and the one this question is about involves genital vacuum pumping. I enjoy having my ball sack pumped to a large size. Would other nudists consider this freakish? I haven't posted any pictures as yet until I feel comfortable with how I will be perceived. I will be glad to post pictures before pumping but pumped is more the real me. Please guide me so I am not out of place. Thanks[/quote] Hiya Baldwin, welcome.
I'm probably one of the more avant garde nudists on here and even I would advise against pumping pictures (and never pump on the beach either). Let's be honest, 'pumped' is not the 'real' you - it is the pumped you, pumping and all that goes with it is more suited to a fetish club, acceptable environment and all that.
Now piercing is a different matter. The only ones I personally have are my ears so I can wear pretty earrings, nevertheless, nose studs, eyebrow, lip, tongue, nipple, navel, genital, labia, (yes brace yourselves people the labia is not the genitals - lord preserve us from people who have no idea of anatomy) ... are essentially no different from my earrings - it is simply a matter of 'geography'. Piercing has become a 'socially acceptable' fashion these days no matter what my personal view of it may be and the removal of the inserted item for any length of time can result in the piercing 'closing over' with attendant problems for the wearer.
In the UK and Europe I meet many fellow nudists sporting attractive piercing jewelry - and jewelry is all it is regarded as. At the end of the day it is a matter of perception. Think rationally about it for a moment. Person A wears a piercing because they think it looks pretty. Person B sees the piercing and immediately connects it with sexual provocation. Who is the more sexually preoccupied? Remember - one can be negatively preoccupied as well as positively preoccupied and that can tell you a whole lot more about a person than they generally want you to know.
It puts me in mind of the old old joke thats been around in my line of work for years. A psychologist is performing the Rorschach inkblot test on a patient. The first card is shown and the patient says "It's a man masturbating". The second card is shown and the patient says "It's a woman masturbating". Third card "Two people having sex". Fourth "It's a sex threesome". This continues throughout the whole set until the psychologist wearily puts the cards down and says to the patient "Your problem is you are obviously sexually obsessed". The patient looks indignant and replies " Me? ME? You're the one with the dirty pictures!"Love n stuff
Rudie
xReactReply
