Definition of Artistic photo's
I'm not into censorship by the moderator regarding photo's but I think contributors need to think twice before posting. Close up's of cocks or vaginas is not artistic, that may be my opinion, but I reckon many would agree. If these were posted elsewhere on this site, they would be removed. Close up's are not artistic, they seem to be people trying to show off their bits. The lighting, context, angles etc. are usually poor, it seems to be people wanting to "push boundaries" or just focus on their bits. If you are going to post, think about how you would tryto justify to a gallery or a school or university art class how your photo is artistic.
I completely agree about the artistic photos: there should be no close-ups of sex ( already there should not be in naturist photos). On the other hand, a beautiful landscape can also make an artistic photo whether or not there is a naked person in the scenery.
I should have added that there are lots of really good & creative photo's posted with clever lighting, angles, poses, context etc. My complaint is about the ones focusing on the genitals up front. We all have them, one set or the other, make the photo about something more.
Agreed, close up's of genitals are often not artistic at all. Again there is a post of a cock close up, there is no artistic element, this guy seems infatuated with it, and no matter how much you feign sleep or whatever, it's not good. Moderator, please remove.