Try Our New Site — Save With Code UPGRADENOW
Our new site is live in preview — check it out here. Pricing goes up once we fully switch over, so lock in today's rate now with code UPGRADENOW for a discount. All memberships transfer automatically, no action needed.
If you could choose where...
If you could choose where you had body hair growing and not growing what parts would have some fur?
My choices would be forearms, legs , chest , and pubes. And a no receding hairline with enough on the face togrow a decent trimmed beard. ( no Duck Dynasty one here)Totally hairless is an answer but boring.
For the record I do have decent amount on my legs, forearms are there but fine. Chest hairs sparse to say the leastdecent crop of pubes. Up top gets thinner by the year. Got a decent stache and enough for a goatee, but the cheek whiskersare sparse.
Others?
If we all had thick hair all over our body's wewouldn't need clothes[/quote]Then we would be more like Wookies, think Chewbaca from Star Wars, or maybe a Sasquatch. Shampoo costs could get extensive, though.
WOW, just thought about it, and it would get REALLY EXPENSIVE for those wanting to be a Smoothie in this situation. Not to mention labor intensive.
If we all had thick hair all over our body's wewouldn't need clothes
Then we would be more like Wookies, think Chewbaca from Star Wars, or maybe a Sasquatch. Shampoo costs could get extensive, though.
And what about ticks and fleas? Those could be annoying also.
There are products made these days that seem to do a good job of controlling them on our pets, so I would figure there would also be products available for people to do the same, if we were so covered with hair like was mentioned above^^^^^.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!