Next To Nude Attire 4 Compliance

This group is for when you must meet minimum requirements for being clothed. Many places in cities people are allowed to wear skimpy lingerie and or kinky micro thong bikinis in order to be considered clothed. Here you can post your pictures of at least wearing a cotton swab, even the nude bike ride in San Diego requires a piece of electrician tape over a nipple in order to pass nudity laws. Some...

Skinzwear Sunseeker

Return to Discussions

Anyone here wear one?
They are about as small as a suit can get without being a thong.
Pouch in front just covers the goods, and a roughly 4" wide strip in back over the crack.
I had one that I would sometimes wear in and around my backyard pool.
Got rid of it when we installed a privacy fence since I then didn't need to wear anything!

This topic was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

I've seen similar things but never heard of that particular brand. I've never owned or worn anything like that.

The closest thing I have to that is a bright red jockstrap that I wore as part of a costume for a costume party. We were all nudists, so the costumes eventually came off.

What I find funny about such things is that they are acceptable in the textile world. They make it clear how completely the textile world objectifies and sexualizes very specific body parts. And if that's not enough, anyone who does not objective or sexualize those body parts is considered a pervert.

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

I've seen similar things but never heard of that particular brand. I've never owned or worn anything like that.The closest thing I have to that is a bright red jockstrap that I wore as part of a costume for a costume party. We were all nudists, so the costumes eventually came off.What I find funny about such things is that they are acceptable in the textile world. They make it clear how completely the textile world objectifies and sexualizes very specific body parts. And if that's not enough, anyone who does not objective or sexualize those body parts is considered a pervert.

The sunseeker rio is advertized as the smallest suit a man can legally wear where thongs are not allowed.
So in the legal sense they are acceptable at least in most places, but I would suspect that the majority of beachgoers in the US would find them unacceptable, not only to wear themselves, but even for seeing on someone else.

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

Oh, and anywhere is far from Australia. We just have to lump it! :-)

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

Oh, and anywhere is far from Australia. We just have to lump it! :-)
Bali, New Zealand, South Pacific Islands are not too far.

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

By minimalist75:

Certainly wider in back. How much front coverage does it have?I do notice that it is too low to cover the top of your crack, which could still be a problem.

Okay, must be my confusion! The pink one is certainly low front and rear. The front is perhaps 1/4" more the the absolute minimum. I have this style also in dark brown with the same coverage.

The style you are talking about is probably this one. Not nearly as low but narrow front and back.

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

By minimalist75:

Certainly wider in back. How much front coverage does it have?

I think I may have confused the two similar models. M57 is the Sunseeker, which is narrower but not so low, but the M37 is cheek-revealingly lower but less narrow. From the photo, the Sunseeker (in orange) seems to ride up just a little but does not feel like it when wearing it. Now featuring two views (while they last!):

This post was edited
RE:Skinzwear Sunseeker

lovley

This post was edited