SU
Sunbeam65صاحب المنشور
Apr 6, 2011It's unfortunate, but not surprising, that this type of advertising is used and intended for younger audiences given the overt sexuality of the pictures. But then it gets cast as 'offensive nudity' rather than calling it 'overt sexuality'. The nudity isn't the issue to me. It is the sexualized nature that is the issue. Thoughts?http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/channel/GovernmentNonProfit/article/1064106/jack-wills-catalogue-banned-offensive-nudity/
تفاعلرداشترك
الردود
- CU
Apr 6, 2011Unfortunately, most of the world accepts overt sexuality as long as it's depicted fully clothed.
That being the case ( whether we agree with it or not ) you'll always find the complaint to be
offensive nudity, even though we know it's coopted terms, not what it says.تفاعلرد