DE
DesertRatUrsprünglicher Verfasser
Oct 9, 2012Over 300 million people live under the US Constitution but very few people really know or understand its true meaning. Even some members of Congress are completely ignorant of what is contained in this document. Actually the Constitution is not so much a set of rules of what people can do, but is a set of rules of what the government CAN NOT do.
Today people are attacking this document as being out dated and not right for our times. Islamists are saying that a much older doctrine, Sharia law, should replace it entirely. Others are pushing for the laws of the United Nations to over rule the Constitution.
These Constitutional detractors are becoming relentless in their efforts and if they are successful the only out come will be total anarchy.
Therefore it is up us, We the People, to protect and defend the Constitution from these evil forces. We can best do that by studying the Constitution and learning the true meaning of what it says and what it means. I believe that any person, regardless of nationality, would be willing to defend the ideals of the Constitution, if they truly understood the document.
Today people are attacking this document as being out dated and not right for our times. Islamists are saying that a much older doctrine, Sharia law, should replace it entirely. Others are pushing for the laws of the United Nations to over rule the Constitution.
These Constitutional detractors are becoming relentless in their efforts and if they are successful the only out come will be total anarchy.
Therefore it is up us, We the People, to protect and defend the Constitution from these evil forces. We can best do that by studying the Constitution and learning the true meaning of what it says and what it means. I believe that any person, regardless of nationality, would be willing to defend the ideals of the Constitution, if they truly understood the document.
ReagierenAntwortenAbonnieren
Antworten
- SO
Oct 14, 2012It's a big world, I'm sure that it has happened. Psychopaths come in all denominations. Look at the Norway shooter.
ReagierenAntworten - SOOct 14, 2012
When you look in the mirror, do you see the back of a naked woman?
ReagierenAntworten - SOOct 14, 2012Now it's not nice to kick a new born kitten.
I mostly watch the CBC and BBC which tend to be more fact based and they don't do a lot of editorializing. They do that, but outside of the reporting of the news. Of course, you can't control who chooses what stories to cover but I've seen stories reported on the CBC that simply would not be covered by an American network, because it isn't about Lindsay Lohan or doesn't lend itself to 10 second sound bites.ReagierenAntworten - MA
Oct 15, 2012[quote]Damn under is there not anything in this word that you like, or at least do not HATE?[/quote]I don't think there is, Gasman. He must be a very sad person, to have so much negativity.ReagierenAntworten - MIMitgliedOct 15, 2012[quote]There is no "balance" there is only the truth. This is what journalists all over the globe have forgotten. What we all must remember is that a "half truth" is just a full lie.[/quote]The only balance would be in the big picture, where opposing, highly opinionated but fact-laced viewpoints act against each other in an attempt to sway the opinions of viewers. In that way, the main players themselves are not balanced, but they only add to balance by providing opposition. Opinions are not facts, but they can be inferences or conclusions made from facts. To believe one side alone to be "truth" is very naive. A full lie includes no truth at all, but a half-truth does include truth, with the omission of certain unwanted facts (depending on goal) to deceive or sway opinion.ReagierenAntworten
- MAOct 15, 2012
[img src="http://drawception.com/pub/panels/2012/4-14/3dQB72ZzjR-8.png">
ReagierenAntworten - SOOct 15, 2012
Well, he is semi-literate and we should applaud the government program that enabled that.
ReagierenAntworten - MIMitgliedDec 8, 2019
thanks, dj
ReagierenAntworten