Just a curious philosophical question.... Who is the bad apple? The person who spreads your photo all over the internet... or the person who is negatively effected by it??
Probably this question is badly worded. I take it the person negatively effected did not post photos to be spread about. So very definitely the 'bad apple' is the one doing the spreading!!
Were the items to be copyrighted, this would be a very litigious matter. Music/film today could be photo's tomorrow!!
I work in Human Resorces for a large company. A supervisor brought me some innocent nude photos found on the internet of one of their employees. They were questioning if we should have such a person in our employ. I said why not. We should be lucky to have some one so secure with them selves that they can feel open about posting such nice stuff. Now if it had been someone in some kind of elligal act.. then it would be handled differently...
Why was the person looking at that site in the first case, as s/he might be the one to have the sack depending on the type of site not the person in the photos.
A clean nude photo is unlikely to attract much unwanted attention for most people but they should be locked in so people can't copy them as done on another site.
Sorry to disagree, but you may find, that if it appears on your screen, then, yes you can copy it.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!