Replies
- FA
Dec 7, 2025https://www.truenudists.com/user/TMF222/
Profile pic is fake. Clearly AI generated.... humans do NOT have hands that look like that.
ReactReply - CO
Dec 8, 2025I think something has finally changed for the better. I don't think you can choose arbitrary photos at sign up for your profile/background photo anymore. Since the photo upload issue was resolve, I haven't come across an objectionable profile photo and it appears the only newer accounts with profile photos are certified.
John aka cobeachbum
ReactReply - CH
Dec 9, 2025naturist_fe2458 is saying she is from the USA but had a phonenumber from Nigeria, so sure part of the Nigerian scams
ReactReply - CO
Dec 10, 2025[quote]https://www.truenudists.com/user/TMF222/Profile pic is fake. Clearly AI generated.... humans do NOT have hands that look like that. FastFive, so have you been through the users friends and those that have liked the profile and advised them of your findings? Not everyone will trawl through this thread before engaging in conversation with a fake user. If anything is to change with the fakes then a more proactive approach is needed[/quote] 95% of the non-certified "women" on this site are fake. It amazes me the number of men that "friend" these accounts. I assume an account is fake until it is at least certified. John aka cobeachbumReactReply - SH
Dec 14, 2025[quote]https://www.truenudists.com/user/TMF222/Profile pic is fake. Clearly AI generated.... humans do NOT have hands that look like that.FastFive, so have you been through the users friends and those that have liked the profile and advised them of your findings? Not everyone will trawl through this thread before engaging in conversation with a fake user.If anything is to change with the fakes then a more proactive approach is needed 95% of the non-certified "women" on this site are fake. It amazes me the number of men that "friend" these accounts. I assume an account is fake until it is at least certified. John aka cobeachbum[/quote] I get at least 2 friend requests a week from some female that has supposedly been on the site at least 3 weeks to 3 months. No pictures of them nude or just no pictures at all. And these fakes have upped their game. Now they try to hold a conversation with you for a while before asking you to talk with them on telegram or whatsapp.ReactReply - LY
Dec 16, 2025Way to go! It must be quite a shock to have your identity used like that.
ReactReply - FA
Dec 28, 2025[quote]95% of the non-certified "women" on this site are fake. It amazes me the number of men that "friend" these accounts. I assume an account is fake until it is at least certified. John aka cobeachbum[/quote] Hate to be the bearer of bad news John, but there are absolutely fake "Certified" profiles as well. Whoever is approving certifications and photo uploads is just phoning it in these days and not really doing the job.ReactReply - NK
Dec 29, 2025The really disturbing thing is the use of AI to carry on fake conversations. I've come across a couple of those. It takes a couple of messaging rounds before it becomes apparent that it's an AI.
ReactReply - SK
Dec 29, 2025There needs to be responsible mediator here to keep the alblots and AL off and delete the message.
ReactReply - SK
Dec 29, 2025There needs to be responsible mediator here to keep the alblots and AL off and delete the message.
ReactReply - HI
Dec 30, 2025https://truenudists.com/user/Nudistmasseuse/
Nudistmasseuse claims shes a girl named Sophie katee from England but uses pictures from a Pinterest account that has Florida in the bio. Also claimed she just happened to be in New York when I risked messaging.
https://in.pinterest.com/sraiiin/_created
ReactReply - CO
Dec 30, 2025[quote]95% of the non-certified "women" on this site are fake. It amazes me the number of men that "friend" these accounts. I assume an account is fake until it is at least certified.John aka cobeachbumHate to be the bearer of bad news John, but there are absolutely fake "Certified" profiles as well. Whoever is approving certifications and photo uploads is just phoning it in these days and not really doing the job.[/quote]
There has never been a requirement that the profile photo (or any photo) be of the account holder (You can decide if that's good, bad, or indifferent). The new certification process forces you to provide ID now and just recently, a change was made that forces any profile or background image to go through the same moderation process as gallery photos. You used to be able to use any photo, including straight up pornography without any moderation. I routinely watch the feed of new accounts and have not had to report any photos for quite some time now. I assume at some point one will slip through.
I realize that simply being certified doesn't mean the person is real, nor that the photo attached is actually of the account holder, but it improves the odds greatly that the account holder isn't a spammer as most would not take the time or effort. I still believe in order to post anything, including photos and comments, should be limited to paid and certified accounts. I would allow Non paid/certified to read the forums and groups, but not view any photos at all. I would make an exception for long time members that have shown they are legitimate.
Also, any post including the name of an off-site app should be auto-deleted.
John aka cobeachbumReactReply - FA
Dec 31, 2025[quote]There has never been a requirement that the profile photo (or any photo) be of the account holder (You can decide if that's good, bad, or indifferent).[/quote] You say that... yet in the chatroom the Moderators have routinely banned accounts that post photos that are not the "user". It happens almost daily. There are countless cases of male accounts posting pics of their other half - sometimes even with said male in the photo as well - but the user gets banned, because according to the Moderators you aren't allowed to post images of people that are not "you".ReactReply - CO
Jan 1, 2026[quote]There has never been a requirement that the profile photo (or any photo) be of the account holder (You can decide if that's good, bad, or indifferent). You say that... yet in the chatroom the Moderators have routinely banned accounts that post photos that are not the "user". It happens almost daily. There are countless cases of male accounts posting pics of their other half - sometimes even with said male in the photo as well - but the user gets banned, because according to the Moderators you aren't allowed to post images of people that are not "you".[/quote] My answer to this apparently got deleted, so here it is again as best as I can remember: Chat rules (Both the actual rules and the ones the chat moderators make up on the spot, including any about photos beyond being sexually aggressive) are different than the general site rules. The chat moderators deleting innocent photos and banning users fall under those "made up rules". The chat room is a clique, and if you aren't part of that clique you get banned for breathing wrong. I rarely enter the chat for this reason, and don't cam at all. My comment about no rule pertaining to a profile photo, or any other media, actually being of you is concerning the main site. John aka cobeachbumReactReply - FA
Jan 2, 2026[quote]https://www.truenudists.com/user/Malij_Duarte/ Uses photos of supermodel Paulina Porizkova[/quote] Yet another "Certified" fake.ReactReply - FA
Jan 2, 2026[quote]https://www.truenudists.com/user/MajestyChantel_here/ uses images of porn actress Diana Cherry, though she photoshops her face on Cherrys body. Needs to work on Photoshop skills.[/quote] I kind of feel the face is AI generated. It looks off to me.ReactReply - FA
Jan 3, 2026Here's another one - https://www.truenudists.com/user/notclothed_lp4585/ Photos are adult star Julia Ann - https://www.pornhub.com/pornstar/julia-ann/photos (Here is her actual profile photo: https://porn7.net/post/nothing-hotter-than-milf-julia-ann-in-a-button-dow-12454061) Using photos of a very well-known performer than has been active in the industry for over 30 years is a new level of stupid. LOL Usually they just grab some random european wannabe model than has posed for unknown sites. This is my actual chatlog with this nonsense account... awful bot, or just bad script following? [quote]Her: Hello Me: hi there Her: How are you doing today Me: Doin OK thanks. You? (just waiting for the BS to start) Her: Same here Her: So how long have you been into nudism Me: started as a teenager... kind of discovered it by accident, didn't really know "nudism" was a thing Her: Wow that also nice Her: So how long have you been into nudism (No, I didn't accidentally copy/paste the same line...) Me: we just covered that Her: My bad[/quote]ReactReply - GO
Jan 7, 2026Looks like they are using Ai to manipulate images to get verification stamp.
Its pointless on here now and they wonder why people wont subscribe
ReactReply - CO
Jan 7, 2026[quote]Looks like they are using Ai to manipulate images to get verification stamp. Its pointless on here now and they wonder why people wont subscribe[/quote] They may have very well used real documentation to certify, but are just using fake (or not of themselves) photos for their profile/gallery photo(s). Disingenuous? yes. Against any site rule? no. I agree your profile photo should be of you or something innocuous like a cartoon character, but that would be impossible to maintain. The easier solution that I've recommended for years is read only unless certified and paid. (and now I'm limiting it to paid. I use say one or the other, but now believe it should be both). I would still allow an exception for longtime members that have shown they are legitimate and provide engage and useful information. John aka cobeachbumReactReply - CO
Jan 8, 2026[quote]Looks like they are using Ai to manipulate images to get verification stamp.Its pointless on here now and they wonder why people wont subscribeThey may have very well used real documentation to certify, but are just using fake (or not of themselves) photos for their profile/gallery photo(s). Disingenuous? yes. Against any site rule? no.I agree your profile photo should be of you or something innocuous like a cartoon character, but that would be impossible to maintain. The easier solution that I've recommended for years is read only unless certified and paid. (and now I'm limiting it to paid. I use say one or the other, but now believe it should be both). I would still allow an exception for longtime members that have shown they are legitimate and provide engage and useful information.John aka cobeachbum Who have you recommended that solution to, and what was the outcome?[/quote] TT2, and dead silence. John aka cobeachbumReactReply - FA
Jan 11, 2026Another Certified profile using stolen images.
https://www.truenudists.com/user/BarefootGirlX/
Pics are of a Suicide Girl named Meggie Ray with photos online dating back to 2013 (that I've found). "BarefootGirlX" states her age as 22... so that would imply she was 9 when the photos were taken.
ReactReply - FA
Jan 22, 2026https://www.truenudists.com/user/talk2kim/
Pics are an adult star named "GND Kayla" or "Camerella Cams"... she's on IG, TikTok, X, etc. Plus loads of free pics and videos of her all over the internet. He profile photo is clearly a still pulled from one of those vids.
ReactReply - CL
Feb 3, 2026I wonder if a person from Ukraine - https://www.truenudists.com/user/Liutik/
really would use the pictures of a russian eroti-model
https://www.blondepornjpg.com/blonde-valeria-from-perm.shtml?utm_medium=organicReactReply