RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

My wifes method is the simple flimsy coverup removal. She gets to the pool area, usually sits on the edge of the chair & pulls her coverup up & over her head. It takes just a few seconds then its grab the floatie and into the water. The best part is her enjoying the nude time with me. YES!!!

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

woodsman21 wrote:

The interesting thing about this sort of situation is that it's an example of a man experiencing what women experience all the time.

It's funny for me as, while I may occasionally be reluctant to strip to in the presence of others I feel it's about me perhaps being too forward. As for their looking they can look as much as they like, it doesn't bother me and is perhaps a little flattering. That brings the other aspect in that I don't feel threatened by their looking when the ladies may not have that same confidence.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

A nicely written last line. I liked it

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

I was just reading about a place where it's not illegal to be naked, but it is illegal to disrobe. Presumably you disrobe in some private place like a tent or a cabin or whatever, and then emerge naked. It's a strange world.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

From what I have heard from female partners over the years for some women being the object of the male gaze in everyday life may be a factor.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

I was just reading about a place where it's not illegal to be naked, but it is illegal to disrobe. Presumably you disrobe in some private place like a tent or a cabin or whatever, and then emerge naked. It's a strange world.

I have read that the law in Vermont is like that.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

I think it was Vermont, actually. It had to do with regulations in a park where nudism is tolerated. I can't remember the name of the park, but if it's important, I'll try to trace it.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

I think it was Vermont, actually. It had to do with regulations in a park where nudism is tolerated. I can't remember the name of the park, but if it's important, I'll try to trace it.

In Burlington VT it is illegal to be nude in a park, but not illegal to walk nude down the street. This is in addition to the statewide rules against getting naked in public while allowing anyone to be naked in public. It still isnt expected behavior to walk around nude and there is footage online of a local news crew following a naked man around the city. The news crew even points out that it is illegal to go into the park when the man crosses the street to avoid the park. They do hound the man until he finally gets dressed (inside since it is illegal to do out in public) and he leaves without talking to them.

This post was edited
RE:Undressing: it should be simple, but is it?

This makes you wonder about the logic our elected officials use to make laws. Somehow, somewhere there was a reason behind it all but it has all but been lost in the implementation. About the only thing you can do is chuckle to yourself & smile. Otherwise, you would go crazy!!

This post was edited