Nudism Should Not Be Sexual
being naked and enjoying the freedom and liberty of not being restrained by clothing should not be sexualized.prudes and perverts alike should not be the ones to set the deffinition of this life style.being nude is completely natural,yet our society allows religon and sex addicted morons to dictate that our bodies must be covered at all times.
just thoughts...Return to Discussions
good day my friends,
im wondering how people feel about a subjuct that honestly seems brushed under the rug in the nudist community, at least from my experience.
to get right into it, erections.more specificaly men who post pictures of themselves on this site while obviously...ahem, excited.
it is my opinion that while an erection is a very natural thing,and often one has no real say in the matter i do not think that pictures including erect members are inapropriate on this site.
so to open a discussion, how do you feel about erections in nudism?
A very sensible reply. As humans, we cannot always control our bodies physical reactions. Why hide or be embarrassed about something that is natural? A man has many variations during the day of erections or partial erections and they happen usually without any prompting and he cannot do anything about it.
Society tends to equate nudity with sexaulity, penises more so and erect penises even more than that. I don't deny erections can be sexual but they don't have to be, and since everything can be sexual, why focus on penises? Why come up with new prefixes all the time when penises just do what penises do? If I get hard from being naked in the sun, does that make me solarsexual? Or is that too hot? I think it's easily silly how we interpret everything and to transfer behaviors into set identities. I prefer to let hard-ons be hard-ons, and if people are less comfortable, sure we can cover or be discreet for all good things must pass.
I hope the guy who posed these questions 7 years ago answered them to his liking in the meantime. He doesn't see why posting pics with erections is inappropriate. I would say that if the owners don't want pics of guys with erections, then it's their prerogative. The site will no doubt appeal to a broader audience, since many nudists discourage public displays of erections. Whether erections occur naturally or spontaneously is a different question from whether they are appropriate for a posted pic. Yeah, for a lot of guys they are apparently popping up all the time, anywhere, for any reason. Up to individual locations to set their rules.
There is a sister site for posting the erection photos. I personally don't mind seeing erections but the rules of the site should be adhered to. If people have problems with obeying the rules they should leave this site and go to one that fits what they want. It seems strange it took seven years for the guy to get a response to his question. He also has a private profile.
While erections are a natural thing for guys and a normal part of life I personally dont think there needs to be pics posted here with them. Im not a prude, this site isnt for posting hard ons or sex pics. TrueSwingers, the sister site is for that. Id rather this site just be for nudity without the hardcore aspects. I dont have a problem with crotch shots of either sex, but dont want to see erections or dripping pussy juice. If I do then Ill go on TS.
I will say that there is a very thin dividing line between nudity and sex and one needs to be aware not to smudge that or cross the boundary . Of course one cannot help one's natural responses to different stimuli and I don't think in a live situation nudists mind as long as those are not being acted upon. These are usually passed off as natural and politely little attention is paid. Of course deliberately posting pictures in those states of arousal calls for specific attention and is not what a nudist site encourages.
I think that there are more and more guys on this sight for reasons other than sharing in the joys of being a nudist or naturist. I get a little pissed off when I see photos allowed on TN that are quite obviously posed to focus on an erect penis - especially when I consider that a candid photo of me, taken by a friend while I was fixing her computer is deemed inappropriate for this site because my testicles are on display, between my thighs and from behind - there is nothing sexual about the photo or the pose but it was not allowed to be uploaded to the BALLS Group. Meanwhile I see photos angling from the feet to an erect penis hiding a distant face OK. Yes erections happen but photos of erections goes beyond open nudism, in my opinion. I'm quite sure that no nudist resort would condom a male, standing naked with hands on hips, shaking his erect penis around in close proximity to a nudist family appropriate.
I think that there are more and more guys on this sight for reasons other than sharing in the joys of being a nudist or naturist. I get a little pissed off when I see photos allowed on TN that are quite obviously posed to focus on an erect penis -
Unfortunately that is what seems to drive much of the traffic on the the site and at the same time drives away genuine naturist/nudists especially women