RE:Intact or circumcized

I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you.This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved!Nina
Another [ Like]

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you.This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved!Nina

U are so right! A bow for u Streetpoet.

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

This whole discussion is so weird. I mean, can you imagine a woman starting a thread in "The Men's Room" saying, "Guys, how do you like your women? Natural boobs, or artificial ones? Big ones, or small ones? Have any of your women friends had surgery to reduce their inner labia, and how did you feel about it?"

And women posting responses about the breast and labial surgeries they've had done, and the reasons they did it.

Nope. It's just another example of us fixating on things that make no real difference at all for true naturism. It's just calling attention to body parts that we usually don't talk about because they're covered up, and now all of a sudden their appearance is sooo important and we've got to talk about it.

If a woman wants her breasts reduced or increased in size, it's her goddamn business and nobody else's. Or nose jobs, or whatever. And if a guy is circumcised or not, it's his goddamn business and nobody else's.

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

Unusual in Sweden

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

Its amazing how people can become blinded by collective consensus. For example - for centuries so-called christians enforced the brutality of slavery, racism was legally enforced in countries that considered themselves civilised and homophobia was expected and supported by legislation.

To hear people talk about unnecessary circumcision as if its normal is shocking to me as a European. Women replying that they prefer circumcised horrifies me - what if a man said he prefers women circumcised - theres be uproar!! And rightly so! Why not cut off their nipples or ears too?

Nature and evolution didnt make just one mistake in the design of the human body which we all celebrate as naturists.

Taking a blade to a little boys healthy penis is an act of sick perversion. In most European countries hospitals and reputable doctors refuse to perform unnecessary circumcision in the same way theyd refuse to remove a healthy kidney from a child.

Foreskins perform a number of important functions.

Lets stop talking about the genital mutilation of boys in the way people used talk about slavery - with collective blindness! It makes no sense!!!

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

em1dub wrote:

Nature and evolution didn't make just one mistake in the design of the human body which we all celebrate as naturists.

Well, I can't agree with you on that. There are a number of flaws in our design, like using the same duct for breathing as for swallowing, or backs that are prone to straining. And somebody said that God wouldn't have been a good civil engineer, since "Who in his right mind would position a sewage dump right next to a recreational area?"

But I do agree that we should leave foreskins alone. My parents opted for circumcision, and I'm stuck with it, but I'm not going to go around singing its praises.

It was thought at the time that there was a correlation between foreskins and venereal disease. Now we know better, and we know that with proper hygiene, we can stop worrying about it.

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

It has been confirmed here that women find uncut cocks disgusting....which they are. The longer the foreskin the more disgusting. The noble penis displays a fine helmet head, not an unsightly anteater.
I am flabbergasted at the number of you uncircumcised men who won't roll your sleeve up (so to speak). You are so lacking in imagination that you haven't given this serious thought? Really?
Just to summarize - it's not a good look, ok? The beauty is you don't need adult surgery, just peel it back. It will shrink over time.
Ur welcome.

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

It has been confirmed here that women find uncut cocks disgusting....which they are. The longer the foreskin the more disgusting. The noble penis displays a fine helmet head, not an unsightly anteater.I am flabbergasted at the number of you uncircumcised men who won't roll your sleeve up (so to speak). You are so lacking in imagination that you haven't given this serious thought? Really?Just to summarize - it's not a good look, ok? The beauty is you don't need adult surgery, just peel it back. It will shrink over time.Ur welcome.

Subtle! LMNAO

Thinking logically, referring to a man as you do as being uncircumcised is hilarious. Do you also refer to men with all four limbs as being unamputated? And are we all undecapitated??

Youve made your personal preference clear and also demonstrated a penchant for being gratuitously insulting and thats actually quite funny.

I respect your right in relation to your own body to cut off any bits you like but Im wondering if you also favour cutting off / out other body parts? Or is is JUST a thing for mutilating penises that you have? Mm. Interesting. Im sure Freud would have loved to meet you!

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

Thinking logically, referring to a man as you do as being uncircumcised is hilarious. Do you also refer to men with all four limbs as being unamputated? And are we all undecapitated?

You make a good point Em! As Monty Python would put it, circumcision is "just a flesh wound"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UijhbHvxWrA

This post was edited
RE:Intact or circumcized

Just as some people get tired of people discussing their "per pees", I'm worn slap out with people getting completely bent out of the fucking frame at any mention of it.

It doesn't matter that was posted in a "women's forum". It could have been posted in the men's forum or even the "sex and sexuality" forum. You can bet your left tit or testicle their STILL would have been someone rolling in with sirens blaring from the Purity Patrol, ready to issue a stink eye and a stern finger wagging about how "this has nothing to do with naturism".

Yes, it does. In as much as genitalia is a part of the human body and sexuality a part of human experience it does. We know - we KNOW - that nudity does not equate to sex. How coukd we not know? There's someone screaming it at every turn, it seems. That still doesn't mran it isn't part if the equation. People always say "there are other places blah blah blah" whenever ANY discussion that even partially touches on sex is attempted. Guess what? I don't WANT to go to a porn site to have a legitimate adult discussion I should be able to have right here among adults.
There IS a societal stigma against cut vs. uncut here in the US and ir IS a valid topic of discussion, and frankly women need to get the fick over it and stop actibg si goddamn indignant about shit.

There is ao much sexism in the nudism community in terms of how it treats men to begin with. That whole "ermagherd! he's got an erection" business is such bullshit. Unless there is accomoanying suggestive behavior along with it, all you're doing is stigmatizing a body part and function. And save it with all that "not a part of nudism" crap when women can - and frequently do - post photos of themselves sitting with their ankles in separate time zones and their hands down at their pusses - sometimes even parting the lips - and no one says a goddamn thing.

You're worn out on dick discussions? I'm worn out on the attempted excising of all things sexual from our nudist lives. It's only the exhausting crusades against it that piss me off enough to want to tell everyone:

"Come look at my pee pee!"

This post was edited

This site is only available to users 18 and over and we use cookies

We use cookies for functionality, social media, and google analytics. To view our cookie policy please view Our Cookie Policy